In lak'ech ala k'in

Avant le "nous", il y a le "je"
Prendre soin de ce "je", le connaître et approcher, entamer cette exploration, ce chemin comme un jeu

Avant le "nous", il y a le "je"
Ce qui ne veut pas forcément dire qu'une dynamique "je" "nous" ne peut pas exister en même temps que le "je", alors que le "je" se découvre, se comprend, s'accepte
Le "nous" soutient le "je" dans son chemin d'être authentiquement "Soi"

Avant le "nous", il y a le "je"
Et c'est bien ainsi, le "nous" n'est-il pas une danse, un jeu entre 2 "je"?

2 "je" qui co-crée un "nous", un espace de lien, d'échange, de don et d'accueil et d'Amour où 2 égos se sont effacés

Ce que "je" ressens, je remercie les autres "je"
pour laisser émerger des "nous", véritables véhicules d'expansion de conscience et d'Amour

Avant le "nous", il y a le "je"
Après le "je", il y a le "nous"
"Je" aime "je", "je-nous" aime

**************************************
Before the "we", there is the "i"
Take care of the "i", get to know it and approach, start this exploration, this path like a game

Before the "we", there is the "i"
It does not have to mean that a "i-we" dynamic can not exist simultaneously with the "i", while "i" is discovering, understanding, accepting itself as it is
The "we" is standing by the "i" on its path of being authentically it Self

Before the "we", there is the "i"
And it is perfect this way: for the "we" is a dance, a play between 2 "i"

2 "i" that cocreate a "we", a space propitious for connection,  learning/ teaching,  giving/receiving, love and compassion
A space in which the ego moved aside

What i feel is that i thank the other "i"s
For that they gave birth to a vast "i", to a " we", genuine vectors of awareness and Love

Before the "we", there is the "i"
After the "i", there is the "we"
"i" love "i", "i" love "we"